0.1627
900 319 0030
x

Shortfalls in Sexual Harassment Laws

iasparliament Logo
October 15, 2018

What is the issue?

  • The #Me Too movement has gained momentum in India, with a recent series of allegations.
  • In this backdrop, it is essential to understand the drawbacks and shortcomings in the present law against sexual harassment at workplace.

What did the 2013 Act do?

  • The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, passed in 2013, is the law in place.
  • The Act expanded the ambit of the earlier Vishaka guidelines, to cover women in any working environment.
  • It ranges from domestic helps to those in the unorganised sector and covers clients and customers.
  • The sphere of the workplace was expanded from immediate office environment to any place visited during the course of employment.
  • It included transportation, and non-traditional workplaces which involve telecommuting.
  • But the #metoo movement suggests that the law urgently requires further expansion.

What are the continuing shortfalls?

  • Past incidents - The biggest and the most obvious gap in the law flows from retrospective accusations.
  • The Act offers no clues to how organisations should proceed when an existing employee stands accused of past transgressions by women with no immediate link to the existing company.
  • Mechanisms - Some organisations have responded by mobilising the internal complaint committee to address backdated external claims.
  • But the law should not rely on the subjectively variable element of organisational wisdom or convention to redress this use.
  • Explicit steps to deal with such contingencies would only reassure women that the legal system takes their rights seriously.
  • Relevance - The Act does not offer guidelines on dealing with questions raised by the movements like the current #metoo tweet-storm.
  • The #metoo movement reflects a greater sense of empowerment.
  • Notably, this space was curtailed by an understandable hesitation to file complaints with the police, under the current law.
  • The law, therefore, needs to move in sync with the times.
  • Implementation - For ordinary women in the unorganised sector, especially in politics, redressal mechanisms are non-existent.
  • The laws stipulate setting up local complaints committees in every district for organisations with 10 or fewer employees.
  • But currently, their existence and functioning is not to any noteworthy levels.
  • There are also no penalties for districts that lack such complaints committees.
  • Balance - The Act needs to acquire some balance by extending the rights to men who stand accused too.
  • Ensuring the principles of natural equity is the best guarantor of women’s rights indeed.
  • Leadership - A crucial reason why women have resorted to public naming and shaming is the unresponsiveness in the formal channels.
  • Leaders across workplaces must thus ensure that the formal system is sensitive and responsive enough for female employees.
  • This is essential for them to confidently come forward and register a complaint.

 

Source: Business Standard

Login or Register to Post Comments
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to review.

ARCHIVES

MONTH/YEARWISE ARCHIVES

Free UPSC Interview Guidance Programme