0.1681
900 319 0030
x

Scheduled Tribes Status

iasparliament Logo
March 15, 2017

What is the issue?

  • The Constitution ensures certain protection and benefits for communities deemed as having Scheduled Tribe (ST) status.
  • Social and political mobilisation has led to the increase of number of STs 225 in 1960 to 700 today.
  • As the number of communities demanding ST status expands, it brings the criteria of the recognition and the legitimacy of the process under scrutiny.

What does the constitution say?

  • The Constitution only states that STs are specified by the President after consultation with the Governor.
  • It does not define or specify a particular criterion.
  • According to the Ministry of Tribal Affairs, the criterion includes
  1. Indication of “primitive” traits,
  2. Distinctive culture,
  3. Geographical isolation,
  4. “Shyness of connect” with the community at large &
  5. “Backwardness”

Who are Narikuravars?

  • Many communities try to prove themselves as meeting the criteria, to avail of the benefits of being accorded ST status.
  • One such group is Narikuravar.
  • They are a semi-nomadic tribe, originating in Northern India before migrating south to Tamil Nadu.
  • They share religious, cultural, and political characteristics with many of the Roma groups in Europe.
  • Traditionally hunters, they were mostly providing security for kings.
  • However, once invaders took over they became nomadic and retreated into forests, where they preserved their traditions and freedoms.
  • When hunting became illegal, they have lived at the margins of the society in dire poverty, making and selling small ornaments.

What is their present socio-economic status?

  • The community struggles with high levels of illiteracy, multiple health challenges, and unemployment.
  • Currently, there are about 8,500 Narikuravar families in Tamil Nadu i.e less than 1% of their population.
  • The government classifies them as a Most Backward Class community.
  • Classifying Narikuravars as OBCs leads to the assumption that they have a higher chance of being above the poverty line than communities recognised as STs.
  • e.g In 2005, the percentage of STs below the poverty line in rural Tamil Nadu was 32% but that of rural OBCs was only 19%.
  • Due to this classification, they have been competing for access to government benefits with nineteen other larger communities with higher socio-economic status.

Do they satisfy the criteria?

  • Their nomadism across rural and urban areas is against the criteria of “geographical isolation”.
  • Narikuravar sell their products to the community at large. So they might not display ‘shyness of connect’.
  • But since these criteria are not explicit, it is difficult for the community to formulate clear political demands.
  • Their efforts since 2013, on grassroots political mobilisation and hunger strikes have increased awareness of the poor state of the community.
  • It has led to efforts by the Centre to amend the Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order of 1950 to include the Narikuravar, Kurivikarran, and Malayelee Gounder among the STs.
  • The bills were introduced in the Lok Sabha in December 2016 and await passage.

What does it signify?

  • The betterment of obviously disadvantaged groups like Narikuravar rests on discretionary political acts.
  • This is because there is no well-developed, transparent criterion and a clear definition of what makes groups eligible for ST status.
  • Such criteria with specific economic and social data should be developed.
  • It can help compare communities requesting ST status with other STs and to the Indian population at large
  • By this greater transparency and confidence in the process can be ensured.

 

Source: Business Line

 

 

Login or Register to Post Comments
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to review.

ARCHIVES

MONTH/YEARWISE ARCHIVES

Free UPSC Interview Guidance Programme