Electoral Bonds for Anonymous Corporate Funding

iasparliament
November 21, 2017
21 days
867
1

Why in news?

  • Electoral Bonds were introduced as a tool to make electoral funding clean and ensure transparency.
  • But it is anything but that and has the potential to completely distort the electoral playing field to favour incumbents. 

How is the transparency in political funding?

  • A ‘Law Commission Report’ noted that opacity in political funding results in “lobbying and capture” of the government by big donors.
  • A survey found that only 31% of the income of political parties that was declared to the IT department was from unknown sources.
  • Notably, it is estimated that the declared income of parties is only a fraction of their total actual income.
  • This is despite the existence of declaration norms, traditionally governed by four legislations:
  • Representation of the People Act (RPA)
  • Income Tax Act
  • Companies Act
  • Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act (FCRA)

What were the norms for political donations?

  • Corporate Donors - Companies had to declare in their profit and loss (P&L) statement, the party-wise break-up of political donations.
  • Also, a company was supposed to be at least three years old to contribute to a party.
  • The maximum cap on its contribution was fixed at 7.5% of its average net profit in the three preceding years.
  • Parties were also not entitled to accept contributions from foreign entities.
  • Public Donors – Anonymous donations were allowed for sums below Rs.20,000.
  • For contributions of Rs.20,000 and above, the identity of the donor was to be disclosed.

What are electoral bonds and its implications?

  • If a business could anonymously fund politics, then it would enable a businessman to lobby for a change in policy with ease.
  • He can then legally funnel a part of the profits accruing from this policy change to the politician or party that brought it about.
  • Electoral bonds are ideal for this and they would also help in the legally routing black money to politics as they are anonymous.
  • The RBI Act was hence amended to enable the issuance of electoral bonds, which would be sold through notified banks.
  • Hypothetical Working Model - Electoral bonds are essentially bearer bonds that ensure donor anonymity.
  • If a company X wishes to contribute Rs.10 crores to party Y, it could buy 10 electoral bonds of Rs.1 crore each from a bank A.
  • Notably, these bonds would carry only a serial number and an expiry date but not the identity of the buyer.
  • Company X would then deposit these bonds in Party Y’s designated account with bank B.
  • Bank B would know that this money belongs to Party Y but it doesn’t record the fact that it has come from Company X.

What are the other legal changes?

  • Finance Act 2016 amended the FCRA to allow parties to accept donations from foreign companies.
  • Also, this year, the Finance Act 2017 was passed, which amended the RPA, the Companies Act and the IT Act.
  • Implications - The 7.5% cap on company donations was eliminated, thereby enabling even loss-making companies to make unlimited donations.
  • The requirement for a company to have been in existence for 3 years has been removed - which would enable even overnight shell companies to route funds.
  • Also, companies no longer need to declare the names of the parties to which they have donated – So, even shareholders won’t know where their money has gone.
  • Parties no longer have to reveal donor identity for contributions above Rs.20,000, if these are in the form of electoral bonds.
  • Also, a foreign company can anonymously donate unlimited sums to any political party without the EC’s knowledge.

What do these bonds mean for a fair electioneering?

  • Skewing Elections - The most evil feature of electoral bonds is their potential to load the dice heavily in favour of the ruling party.
  • In the hypothetical model above, only bank A knows the donor, while only bank B knows the recipient.
  • But both the banks report to the RBI, which has been malleable to the Central government’s dictates.
  • So, only the ruling party can ascertain which companies donated to the Opposition parties.
  • It is then free to use the organs of the state to gently dissuade (or retaliate against) these donors who bankroll the opposition.
  • Hence, once the scheme for electoral bonds is notified, the Opposition parties may struggle to raise adequate funds.
  • Government’s rationale - Electoral bonds was said to protect donors from harassment due to anonymity.
  • But this argument doesn’t stand merit as the proposed module would do little to address such harassment.
  • On the contrary, it can actually facilitate further harassment due to the removal of maximum caps on donations.
  • Going forward, there is little doubt that democracy will be the biggest casualty if electoral bonds get notified.

 

Source: The Hindu

1 comments
Login or Register to Post Comments

Sravan 5 days

Thank you for the brief

DATEWISE ARCHIVES - CURRENT AFFAIRS

MONTH/YEARWISE ARCHIVES

DATEWISE ARCHIVES - MAINSTORMING

MONTH/YEARWISE - MAINSTORMING