0.1604
900 319 0030
x

Arab Spring 2.0 - Protests in Algeria and Sudan

iasparliament Logo
April 24, 2019

What is the issue?

  • The recent protests in Algeria and Sudan have entered a critical phase in which protesters and militaries are at a stand-off.
  • With this, there is a possibility that protests could move to other Arab countries as well, resembling the earlier Arab spring.

What was the Arab Spring?

  • Arab spring refers to a series of uprisings in the countries of the Arab region in 2011, leading to the ousting of several dictators.
  • Protests broke out in Tunisia in late 2010 and spread to other countries including Tunisia, Egypt, Yemen, Libya, Bahrain and Syria.
  • There were hopes that the Arab world was in for massive changes and expectations that the old autocracies would be replaced with new democracies.
  • But Tunisia was the only country where the revolutionaries outwitted the counter-revolutionaries.
  • They overthrew Zine El Abidine Ben Ali’s dictatorship, and the country transitioned to a multi-party democracy.
  • Except Tunisia, the country-specific stories of the Arab uprising were largely tragic.

What led to the Arab spring?

  • The Arab uprising was originally triggered by a combination of factors.
  • The rulers had been in power for decades, and there was popular longing for freedom from their repressive regimes.
  • Also, the economic model based on patronage was crumbling in those countries.
  • The key driving force behind the protests was a pan-Arabist anger against the old system.
  • So, though the revolutionaries' targets were their respective national governments, the protests were transnational in nature.
  • This is the very reason why the spirit spread quickly from Tunis to Cairo, Benghazi and Manama.

Is Arab Spring 2.0 in the making?

  • The negative impact due to repressions after the Arab Spring did not kill the revolutionary spirit of the Arab youth.
  • This is now being showcased in the protests in Sudan and Algeria with similar anti-government demonstrations.
  • Algeria, whose economy is heavily dependent on the hydrocarbon sector, took a hit after the post-2014 commodity meltdown.
  • GDP growth slowed from 4% in 2014 to 1.6% in 2017, and youth unemployment soared to 29%.
  • This economic downturn was happening when Mr. Bouteflika was missing from public engagement, after being paralysed by stroke in 2013.
  • But when he announced candidacy for this year’s presidential election, seeking another five-year term, it infuriated the public.
  • In a matter of days, protests spread across the country, which culminated in his resignation on April 2, 2019.
  • Sudan is also battling a serious economic crisis leading to protests. Click here to know more on Sudan's case.
  • Protesters in both countries demanded regime change, like their comrades in Egypt and Tunisia did in 2011.
  • So both Abdelaziz Bouteflika and Omar al-Bashir who had ruled Algeria for 20 years and Sudan for 3 decades respectively had to quit.
  • This has revived memories of the Tunisian and Egyptian uprisings earlier, suggesting an Arab Spring 2.0.
  • Like in the case of 2010-11, the 2018-19 protests are also transnational.
  • They spread from Amman (Jordan) to Khartoum (Sudan) and Algiers (Algeria) in a matter of months.

What are the key driving factors now?

  • The pan-Arabist anger against national governments remains the main driving force behind the protests.
  • Old order - Most Arab economies are now beset with economic woes.
  • The rentier system Arab monarchs and dictators built is in a bad shape.
  • Arab rulers for years bought loyalty of the masses in return for patronage, which was then granted by the fear factor.
  • But this model is no more viable.
  • Oil prices - Having touched $140 a barrel in 2008, the price of oil collapsed to $30 in 2016.
  • This impacted both oil-producing and oil-importing countries.
  • Producers, reeling under the price fall, had cut spending; both public spending and aid for other Arab countries.
  • The aid that non-oil-producing Arab economies such as Jordan and Egypt were dependent on started to dry up.
  • In May 2018, there were massive protests in Jordan against a proposed tax law and rising fuel prices.
  • Demonstrators left the streets only after Prime Minister Hani Mulki resigned.
  • His successor had to withdraw the legislation and King Abdullah II made an intervention to freeze the price hike.

What keeps the revolutions from succeeding?

  • In all these countries, the counter-revolutionary forces are so strong.
  • So protesters often stop short of achieving their main goal of putting an end to the old order.
  • Revolutionaries manage to get rid of the dictators, but the system they built survives somehow and sometimes in a moral brutal fashion.
  • A key counter-revolutionary factor is the guardians of the old system, either the monarchy or the army.
  • E.g. After the 2011 protests, in Egypt, the army made a comeback
  • It further tightened its grip on the state and society through violence and repression.
  • In Jordan, the monarch always acts as a bulwark against revolutionary tendencies.
  • The second counter-revolutionary factor is the geopolitical actors.
  • E.g. In Libya, the foreign intervention removed Muammar Qaddafi, but the war destroyed the Libyan state and institutions
  • It ultimately left the country in the hands of competing militias and is yet to recover from the anarchy triggered by the intervention.
  • In Syria too, with foreign intervention, the protests first turned into an armed civil war.
  • Soon, the country itself became a theatre of wars for global players.
  • In Yemen, protests turned into a sectarian civil conflict, with foreign powers taking different sides.
  • In Bahrain, Saudi Arabia made a direct military intervention, on behalf of its rulers, to violently end the protests in Manama’s Pearl Square.

How does the future look?

  • Similar counter-revolutionary factors now play at Algeria and Sudan as well.
  • In Khartoum, protesters are demanding an immediate handover of power to a civilian government.
  • But in both countries, the army let the Presidents fall, but retained its grip on power, despite pressure from protesters.
  • They clearly do not seem to be bringing in a regime change.
  • Sudan faces the heat of geopolitical intervention as well.
  • As soon as the military council directly took power, Saudi Arabia, the U.A.E. and Egypt offered support to the military.
  • It is to be seen if the mass movements meet their revolutionary goals.

 

Source: The Hindu

Login or Register to Post Comments
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to review.

ARCHIVES

MONTH/YEARWISE ARCHIVES

Free UPSC Interview Guidance Programme