Bridging India and EU

Why in news?

The upcoming visit to New Delhi of the EU’s High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Federica Mogherini, will likely witness a frank Indo-European dialogue on the changing global and regional security environments.

What are the areas of divergence?

• Stalled negotiations over the Free Trade Agreement.
• Mutual recriminations on combating climate change, and
• Divergent positions on Russia’s role during the Crimean crisis. As a result, the strategic partnership has been far from “strategic”.

What should be the area of focus?

• Prime Minister Modi’s visit to Brussels and the resumption of the EU-India summit in 2016 marked a turning point.
• The summit saw a much stronger focus on security cooperation and the adoption of a joint declaration on counterterrorism.
• So, pivoting around “principled pragmatism”, the EU’s new Global Strategy (2010) underlines the “direct connection between European prosperity and Asian security”.
• In their meetings, Ms. Mogherini and Foreign Minister Sushma Swaraj and National Security Adviser Ajit Doval should focus on converging foreign policy priorities into coordinated or common practices.
• Foremost is dealing with challenges in their shared extended neighbourhood, which stretches from Istanbul to Islamabad and from Moscow to Mauritius.
• This Eurasian arc of instability is of critical importance to Brussels and New Delhi’s aspirations to stabilise their regional peripheries.
• Afghanistan would be the logical starting point. Political coordination through an EU-India-Afghanistan trilateral, with regular security consultations to exchange assessments, could be the first step in this direction.
• The Indian Ocean region offers another potential area for cooperation.

What about China?

• With uncertainty surrounding American commitments and the formidable rise of China, the EU and India will also have to stop ignoring the dragon in the room.
• Delhi is keen to counter China’s European offensive, including €50 billion worth of investments since 2000, a dialogue with the EU on the Belt and Road initiative, and the ‘16+1’ mechanism (a platform created in April 2012 by China and 16 Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries).
• As Europe realises the costs of dependence on China, the EU must have a serious dialogue with India and other partners on how to pursue Eurasian connectivity plans that are truly multilateral and sustainable.

What is the way ahead?

• Finally, the EU and India also have similar stakes in stronger international institutions and a liberal order that protects global commons cooperatively.
• If they agree to expand consultations on issues such as climate, trade and space, it is likely that Delhi and EU will find themselves agreeing far more times than usually expected.

Source: The Hindu