0.1544
900 319 0030
x

Emerging 'Strategic Autonomy'

iasparliament Logo
September 18, 2018

What is the issue?

  • The idea of “strategic autonomy” was for long central to Indian foreign policy discourse after the Cold War.
  • But now, there is a new enthusiasm for independent foreign and security policies among many other countries.

What are the recent developments?

  • Idea - The debate on strategic autonomy has been most vocal in the European Union.
  • It is also beginning to acquire some traction among Asian allies like Japan, South Korea and Australia.
  • Europe feels that it could no longer rely on U.S. alone for its security.
  • It is felt that Europe should take its destiny into its own hands and become a credible sovereign actor on the global stage.
  • Measures - The EU has unveiled an ambitious agenda for common defence.
  • This includes -
  1. Permanent Structured Security Cooperation under the common security and defence policy
  2. development of a joint interventionary force
  3. the establishment of a $15-billion European Defence Fund
  • Moreover, strategic autonomy and nuclear weapons are often seen as two sides of the same coin.
  • France and the U.K. have been talking for a while of pooling their nuclear resources for a “European deterrent force”.
  • Germany, despite its long-standing nuclear aversion, has now begun to debate the merits of a German nuclear option.

How is the U.S. a reason for these?

  • The new emphasis on autonomy is more a result of unprecedented pressure from the U S.
  • The U.S. President Trump is questioning the need for America's efforts and costs in protecting its rich allies in Europe and Asia.
  • The importance of America paying for the maintenance of the “liberal international order” is given least thought.
  • Trump is also conscious of ensuring US alliance commitments in Europe and Asia.
  • This has begun to compel the US allies to reflect on the need for strategic autonomy.

What is the case with India?

  • It is claimed in India that “strategic autonomy” is a general and fundamental principle of India’s foreign policy.
  • However, it tends to be invoked only in relation to the United States and never in the discussion of the ties with Russia or China.
  • U.S. is now more aligned with India on key regional and global interests than Russia or China.
  • These include the issues on Pakistan, cross-border terrorism and security in the Indo-Pacific.
  • Under the present government, India has begun to take a more practical view of “strategic autonomy”.
  • It has shed some of the inhibitions against security cooperation with the West.
  • The Defence partnerships with the US and France have finally begun to gain progress.
  • Nevertheless, the residual legacy of “strategic autonomy” is raised to limit India's deeper engagement with the US.

What is the significance now?

  • In India's case, it is the fear of American “entrapment” that was a driving factor for its thinking on “strategic autonomy.”
  • On the other hand, it is the fear of US “abandonment” that shapes the present European debate.
  • Trump’s “America First” policy would not have mattered for US allies if Europe and Asia were at peace with themselves.
  • But they are not at present.
  • The assertiveness of Russia in Europe and China in Asia and the deepening alliance between them are evident.
  • These add to the pressures on not just the US allies but also India.

What is the way forward?

  • India must end its neglect of existing European structures like NATO, and pay attention to the emerging defence institutions.
  • The EU, on its part, must begin to integrate India into its security framework.
  • Deepening defence partnership is a good way to enhance the strategic autonomy of India and Europe in an uncertain world.

 

Source: Indian Express

Login or Register to Post Comments
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to review.

ARCHIVES

MONTH/YEARWISE ARCHIVES

Free UPSC Interview Guidance Programme