0.1666
900 319 0030
x

Learning Outcome-based Curriculum Framework - Choice Based Credit System

iasparliament Logo
April 26, 2019

Why in news?

Delhi University is in the process of revising all of its undergraduate programmes along the lines of UGC’s Learning Outcome-based Curriculum Framework (LOCF).

What is the LOCF?

  • The LOCF specifies what graduates are expected to know, understand and be able to do at the end of their programme of study.
  • LOCF approach makes the student an active learner and the teacher a good facilitator.
  • The idea is to decide the desired outcome within the framework of the current Choice Based Credit System (CBCS) for undergraduate and postgraduate programmes.
  • The outcomes will be determined in terms of skills, knowledge, understanding, employability, attributes, attitudes, values, etc.
  • The curriculum will have to be designed to obtain these outcomes.
  • In this line, in 2018, UGC issued a public notice followed by a direction to all central institutions.
  • It directed them to form subject-specific committees for implementing the Learning Outcomes-based Curriculum Framework.

What are the earlier changes?

  • The coming change (LOCF) will be the fifth in the last 9 years at the Delhi University (DU).
  • In 2010, the undergraduate programme switched from the traditional annual mode to the semester mode.
  • In 2013, this was changed to Four Year Undergraduate Programme (FYUP) which again switched back to semester mode in 2014.
  • In the year after that (2015), the Choice Based Credit System (CBCS) was introduced.

What are the concerns?

  • Teachers at Delhi University (DU) are concerned about the frequent changes in the undergraduate curriculum.
  • Each of the “reforms” was announced without warning, and implemented the very next year.
  • They were introduced with the objective of improving the quality of education and scaling up DU’s world ranking.
  • But the outcome, as critics point out, has been the opposite.
  • Each change has disrupted the functioning of the system, and caused confusion and trauma among students.

What are the shortfalls in LOCF change?

  • The committees formed to recommend changes in the 2019-20 curriculum (in line with LOCF) have some major limitations.
  • The subject-specific committees formed by DU were given only 3 months to submit their reports; not all stakeholders were consulted.
  • Also, all departments have been asked to assign this work to their three “best teachers”.
  • But no criteria were decided to assess and rank teachers for this purpose.
  • Besides, LOCF is to be implemented immediately, and there is inadequate time for preparation.
  • Importantly, the CBCS pattern of the undergraduate programme itself is said to be faulty.
  • So the committees now are supposed to bring changes in the curriculum within this faulty framework.

What are the main features of the CBCS?

  • The marks or percentage based evaluation system obstructs the flexibility for the students to study the subjects/courses of their choice.
  • It also restricts their mobility to different institutions.
  • UGC wanted to replace this system with the Choice Based Credit System (CBCS).
  • Besides the core subjects, CBCS offers opportunities to explore and learn other subjects for holistic development of an individual.
  • E.g. the Generic Elective (GE) course has to be compulsorily taken from an unrelated discipline/subject
  • Students can also undergo additional courses and acquire more than the required credits and adopt an interdisciplinary approach to learning.

What are the drawbacks in CBCS?

  • The three major problems involved in CBCS are:
  1. repetition of papers
  2. highly heterogeneous classes
  3. creation of situations in which students don’t acquire much knowledge about one particular subject
  • In some cases, the same papers are offered as Core (compulsory) papers as well as general elective.
  • So students make choices not to add to their knowledge, but mainly to lessen their burden.
  • Moreover, students of different disciplines opting for a GE of a particular discipline creates a class of students who are very different from each other.
  • In such cases, teachers find it difficult to handle a subject as students differ in their understanding, exposure, knowledge, aptitude, etc.
  • E.g. teaching a Commerce Generic to a Mathematics student is different from teaching it to an English literature student
  • So the lack of synchronization in interdisciplinary syllabus formulation has made teaching-learning more difficult.
  • In all, without a re-look at the CBCS framework, changes in the curriculum through LOCF will end up being another ineffective exercise.

 

Source: Indian Express

Login or Register to Post Comments
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to review.

ARCHIVES

MONTH/YEARWISE ARCHIVES

Free UPSC Interview Guidance Programme