900 319 0030

Haryana’s Job Reservation Law – Rationale and Legal Questions

iasparliament Logo
March 05, 2021

What is the issue?

  • The Haryana State Employment of Local Candidates Bill, 2020 passed earlier was notified recently.
  • Here is a look at the government’s rationale for this law, and the constitutional questions such laws would face if challenged in court.

What does the law say?

  • The law requires private companies to set aside 75% of jobs for domiciles.
  • This applies for jobs up to a monthly salary of Rs 50,000 or as may be notified by the government from time to time.
  • It is applicable to all the companies, societies, trusts, limited liability partnership firms, partnership firms and any person employing 10 or more persons.
  • It would also include an entity as may be notified by the government from time to time.
  • In July 2019, the Andhra Pradesh government had passed a similar law, which was challenged in court.
  • The Andhra Pradesh High Court had made a prima facie observation that the move might be unconstitutional.
    • But the challenge is yet to be heard on merits.

What is Haryana government’s rationale?

  • Haryana’s unemployment rate has been far in excess of the national average since August 2017.
  • It reached a peak in April 2020 when four out of every 10 people looking for a job failed to get one.
  • The Covid-induced lockdowns have been removed and the economy opened up.
  • But Haryana’s unemployment rate has continued to be high and is still rising.
  • The work opportunities in the government is also shrinking.
  • The law thus comes at addressing these or dealing with these.

What are the legal issues in such laws?

  • Domicile reservation in jobs - Domicile quotas in education are fairly common.
  • However, courts have been reluctant in expanding this to public employment.
  • The Madhya Pradesh government recently decided to reserve all government jobs for “children of the state.”
  • This raised questions relating to the fundamental right to equality of citizens.
  • Private sector - Another more contentious question is the issue of forcing the private sector to comply with reservations in employment.
  • For mandating reservation in public employment, the state draws its power from Article 16(4) of the Constitution.
  • The Constitution thus places the responsibility of ensuring equality of all citizens squarely on the state.
  • The Constitution has no manifest provision for private employment from which the state draws the power to make laws mandating reservation.
  • The Courts will have to see if the state was delegating its role to the citizens, and whether that is permissible.

What are the governments’ arguments in bringing such laws?

  • Public sector jobs constitute only a minuscule proportion of all jobs.
  • Legislators have thus talked about extending the legal protections to the private sector.
  • The objective is to really achieve the constitutional mandate of equality for all citizens.
  • Another argument is that private industries use public infrastructure in many ways.
  • E.g. accessing land through subsidised allotment, receiving credit from public banks, tax exemptions and in many cases subsidies for fuel, etc
  • So, the state has a legitimate right to require them to comply with the reservation policy.
  • A similar argument was made in requiring private schools to comply with the Right to Education Act, which the Supreme Court also upheld.
  • Besides these, such laws may be seen as populist move too.

What are the likely implications of such laws?

  • Domicile reservations might lead to balkanisation of India’s labour market.
  • Free mobility of labour corrects several demographic and economic imbalances among states.
  • Curbing this mobility will inhibit overall economic growth and employment generation.
  • With Haryana too, the law is likely to hurt the low-skilled workers.
  • It might push the state’s industrial and services sector towards greater “informalisation”.
  • In other words, the same workers will be paid less and have next to nothing social security because they will not be formally on the payrolls.
  • According to the Periodic Labour Force Survey, nearly 97% of workers in the private sector draw a salary of less than Rs 50,000 a month.
  • So the Rs 50,000 monthly salary limit would cover most of the private sector employment in the state.

Do other countries take such affirmative action in employment?

  • Affirmative action is adopted in many countries in the context of race and gender.
  • E.g. in the US, there is no statutory requirement for employers to have quotas.
  • But courts can order monetary damages and injunctive relief, including “such affirmative action as may be appropriate”, for victims of discrimination.
  • This power comes from the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of race, colour, national origin, religion, and sex.
  • Canada has the Employment Equity Act in place.
  • It protects minority groups, especially aboriginals from discrimination in federally regulated industries, even in the private sector.


Source: The Indian Express

Login or Register to Post Comments
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to review.



Free UPSC Interview Guidance Programme