900 319 0030

Independent Payments Regulatory Board - RBI's Dissent

iasparliament Logo
October 23, 2018

Why in news?

The RBI has opposed the government's proposal to set up a separate and independent regulator for the payments industry in the country.

What was the proposal?

  • An inter-ministerial committee was earlier set up by the Department of Economic Affairs.
  • It was tasked to finalise amendments to the Payment & Settlement Systems (PSS) Act, 2007.
  • Recommendations - The committee proposed the establishment of an Independent Payments Regulatory Board (PRB).
  • The aim is to foster competition and consumer protection, systemic stability and resilience in the payments sector.
  • It also recommended having a government-appointed chairperson for the PRB.
  • It held that the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) should look at dispute cases related to the payments.
  • Besides, the Payment Council of India (PCI) also maintained that the payments sector has undergone a sea change in the last 7-8 years.
  • So, there are various types of risks involved, and a risk-based regulation is the need of the hour.

What is RBI's rationale?

  • In a dissent note, the RBI has rejected the above recommendations.
  • It has argued that payment systems are a sub-set of currency, which is regulated by the RBI.
  • There is an overarching impact of monetary policy on payment and settlement systems and vice-versa.
  • This adds validity to the idea that regulation of payment systems remain with the monetary authority i.e. the RBI.
  • Also, the activities of payments banks come well within the purview of the traditional banking system.
  • So there is no case of having a separate regulator for payment systems outside the RBI.
  • Regulation of the banking systems and payment system by the same regulator provides synergy.
  • Nevertheless, RBI is open to changes and is not totally against a new PSS Bill, if required.
  • However, the changes should not result in the existing foundations being shaken.
  • They should not result in potential creation of disturbances in an otherwise well-functioning and internationally-acclaimed structure.
  • RBI also held it would prefer the Payments Regulatory Board to function under the purview of the RBI Governor.
  • It, however, may comprise three members nominated by the government and the RBI respectively.
  • It should come with a casting vote for the governor to ensure smooth operations of the board.
  • The recommendation on Securities Appellate Tribunal was also rejected by the RBI.
  • The exchanges and securities markets are not under the purview of the Payment Systems Bill.
  • So there is no rationality in bringing SAT for resolving payment system-related cases.

Why is RBI's decision welcome?

  • There is definite overlapping of the current regulatory powers of the RBI and the proposed regulations for the payments industry.
  • A unified regulator can thus help lower the regulatory compliance costs and enable the seamless implementation of rules.
  • Further, there is a risk that a brand new regulator may be unable to match the expertise of the RBI in carrying out regulatory duties.
  • This is especially given the fact of rapidly growing payments industry which can ill-afford regulatory errors at this point.
  • Moreover, the decision comes as an expression of RBI's firm stance against any dilution of its current powers over the financial sector.

What lies ahead?

  • The move comes as an instance of RBI and Union government being at loggerheads over the legitimate extent of their powers.
  • RBI's dissent against government’s plans has potentially set the stage for a regulatory turf war.
  • But, at this time of increasing risks to the stability of domestic financial system, both the government and RBI must work together.

Source: BusinessLine, The Hindu

Quick Facts

Payments Council of India

  • The Payments Council of India was formed under the aegis of IAMAI (Internet and Mobile Association of India) in the year 2013.
  • It was set up to cater to the needs of the digital payment industry, address and help resolve various industry level issues and barriers.
  • It works to promote payments industry growth and to support the national goal of ‘Cash to Less Cash Society’ and ‘Growth of Financial Inclusion’.
Login or Register to Post Comments
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to review.



Free UPSC Interview Guidance Programme