0.1523
900 319 0030
x

India’s Role in Kashmir’s Woes

iasparliament Logo
April 03, 2018

What is the issue?

  • The evolution of the Kashmir conflict is a complex one that successive governments have failed to address comprehensively.  
  • It needs to be recognized that Pakistan is not the only problem factor in Kashmir and that there is an internal crisis too.

How did Kashmir accede to India?

  • While Pakistan was aggressive to get Kashmir to accede to it, kashimiri leadership wanted to retain their independence.
  • Due to Paksitani aggression and the tribal invasion of 1947, the Kashmiris leadership was left with no option but to accede to India conditionally.
  • Hence, Kashmir acceded to the Indian union under unique circumstances that defied the logic of religion based partition of the sub-continent.
  • Because of this, article 370 was provided as a special protection in order to safeguard its cultural and ethnic composition.
  • Notably, despite strong opposition, the charismatic Sheik Abdullah had convinced the Kashmiris that joining India was the best option for Kashmir.

What caused the alienation of Kashmiris?

  • Hindu communal forces, led by the Jan Sangh, began agitating from 1950 for the removal of Article 370, which was seen as a threat to the Kashmiri identity.
  • This had a major psychological impact on the Valley’s population and on Sheikh Abdullah personally, which marked the beginning of internal strife.
  • While Mr. Abdullah became Kashmiri Prime Minister in 1951 (the head of the Kashmiri state was called PM then), his government was dismissed in 1953.
  • He was also imprisoned by the Nehruvian government on the suspicion lobbying internationally for creating an independent Kashmir.
  • For two decades after that, New Delhi rigged elections and appointed its own proxies as Chief Ministers, eroding the valley’s faith in Indian democracy.

How did militancy start?

  • While the Indian state was engrossed with Pakistan’s foray in Kashmir, it failed to rectify its meddling in the valley’s polity, which strained its legitimacy.
  • An agreement reached between PM Indira Gandhi and Sheikh Abdullah in 1975 granted some autonomy to the valley and did promise a new beginning.
  • But with Abdullah’s death and his son Farooq’s rise, the India government under PM Rajeev Gandhi soon backtracked and the progress was stalled. 
  • These actions eroded the legitimacy of the Abdullah clan, which was the face of moderate Kashmiri sub-nationalism and provided impetus to extremists.
  • The elections of 1987 were openly rigged in order to diminish the anticipated performance of the extremist party “Muslim United Front” (MUF).
  • But this action contrarily increased the popularity of the MUF, and people came to the streets and subsequently took to arms from 1990 onwards. 
  • In the midst of this internal churn, Pakistan, unsurprisingly threw its weight behind the proponents of “Free Kashmir”, although it was against its stand.

 

Source: The Hindu

Login or Register to Post Comments
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to review.

ARCHIVES

MONTH/YEARWISE ARCHIVES

Free UPSC Interview Guidance Programme