900 319 0030

Italian Marines’ Case

iasparliament Logo
July 04, 2020

Why in news?

The Permanent Court of Arbitration has given its judgment in the Italian Marines’ Case.

What is the case?

  • In 2012, two Kerala fishermen were shot dead by Italian marines from the Enrica Lexie.
  • Enrica Lexie is about 20.5 nautical miles off India’s coast.

What is the judgment?

  • The Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) admitted that both India and Italy had concurrent jurisdiction in the matter.
  • However, it ruled that India does not have jurisdiction to try the marines as they were acting on behalf of a state.

What are the points favouring India?

  • The PCA found that the Italian vessel had violated the rights and freedom of navigation of the Indian fishing vessel under UNCLOS.
  • [UNCLOS - United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea]
  • The PCA has also found that the action, which caused loss of lives, property and harm, merited compensation.
  • It asked the parties to consult each other on the compensation due to India as a result.

What is the argument that the PCA reject?

  • The PCA rejected a key argument by Italy that India led the Italian vessel into its territory and arrested the marines.
  • Another rejected argument is that India violated its obligation under Article 100 of UNCLOS.
  • [Article 100 of UNCLOS is regarding measures to suppress piracy.]
  • This may mean that the PCA did not view the incident as one related to piracy at all.

Is the incident really an international issue?

  • The circumstances indicate that there was no attempt at piracy by the fishing vessel.
  • The fishing vessel was within India’s Contiguous Zone.
  • It was quite clear that the offence warranted arrest and prosecution by the Central government under domestic law.
  • As legal tangles were being sorted out, and India was dealing with the diplomatic fallout, the marines managed to obtain orders to leave India.
  • The National Investigation Agency’s invocation of a domestic act caused a diplomatic furore as it provides for the death penalty.
  • Ultimately, it took time for these charges to be dropped.

What is the conclusion?

  • The PCA’s award is final and has been accepted by India.
  • This is a huge setback for the expectation that the two marines would face a criminal trial in India.
  • The takeaway for India should be the lessons, in the legal and diplomatic domains, which can be drawn from the experience.

Source: The Hindu

Quick Facts

Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA)

  • It is an intergovernmental organization located at The Hague, the Netherlands.
  • It provides a forum for the resolution of international disputes through arbitration and other peaceful means.
  • It provides services of arbitral tribunal to resolve disputes between member states, international organizations, or private parties arising out of international agreements.
  • In PCA, parties can themselves select the arbitrators.
  • The organization is not a United Nations agency but has observer status in the UN General Assembly.
  • The rulings of PCA are binding but the tribunal has no powers for enforcement.

UN Convention on the Law of Sea (UNCLOS)

  • It is the international agreement that resulted from the 3rd UN Conference on the Law of the Sea.
  • It provides a regulatory framework for the use of the world’s seas and oceans.
  • UN has no direct operational role in the implementation of the Convention.
Login or Register to Post Comments
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to review.



Free UPSC Interview Guidance Programme