0.1716
900 319 0030
x

On Path to Fiscal Consolidation

iasparliament Logo
February 10, 2018

What is the issue?

  • The government has been breaching the fiscal deficit targets time and again.
  • Understanding the fiscal status in the light of the recent budget and the recent review committee's recommendations is imperative.

What is the FRBM Act?

  • The Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management (FRBM) Act was enacted in 2003.
  • It led to the framing of FRBM Rules in 2004.
  • Rules - It essentially sets targets for the Central government to ensure fiscal discipline.
  • The FRBM rules set a target:
  1. for reduction of fiscal deficit to 3% of the GDP by 2008-09 (with annual reduction target of 0.3% of GDP)
  2. for complete elimination of revenue deficit by 2008-09 (with annual reduction target of 0.5% of the GDP)
  • Amendments - The target of 3% was achieved only once, in 2007-08.
  • It was thus first postponed and later suspended in 2009, following the global financial crisis.
  • The FRBM Act was later amended twice, in 2012 and 2015.
  • In May 2016, the government set up the NK Singh committee to review the FRBM Act.
  • In this backdrop, the recent budget has reset the target again.

What is the present fiscal picture?

  • FISCAL DEFICIT - The current Budget has retained the fiscal deficit at 3.5% of GDP.
  • This is a deviation from the budgeted target of 3.2%.
  • 3.2% itself is a deviation from the stipulated target of 3% for 2017-18 in the amended FRBM Act.
  • DEBT - The debt-GDP ratio has increased to 49.1% in 2017-18 from 48.7% in 2016-17.
  • The increase in debt-GDP ratio is against a declining trend observed until recently.
  • MTFP - As per the requirement of the FRBM Act, a medium-term fiscal policy (MTFP) statement is presented in each Budget.
  • The statement pertains to fiscal, revenue, and effective revenue deficits, and outstanding debt of the Central government.
  • A review of the statements highlights missing the targets for all four variables often by big margins.

What are the recent changes in targets?

  • FISCAL DEFICIT - Budget 2018-19 has proposed amending the FRBM Act again.
  • This will shift the target of 3% fiscal deficit-GDP ratio to end-March 2021.
  • DEBT - The general debt-GDP ratio is slated to be reduced to 60% of the GDP by 2024-25.
  • The Central government debt-GDP ratio is to be reduced to 40% of the GDP by 2024-25.
  • These targets are based on the recommendations of the FRBM Review Committee.
  • However, the committee's target of 2022-23 is shifted to 2024-25.

What are the deviations from the recommendations?

  • FISCAL DEFICIT - The FRBM review committee proposed the fiscal deficit to GDP ratio to be stabilised at 2.5%.
  • This target is derived in reference to the annual estimate of available investible resources at 10% of GDP.
  • It comprises of surplus savings of the household sector and sustainable net capital inflows.
  • Apparently, the government did not accept this and continued with the 3% target.
  • If 3% target is the case, the government would have continued with the present FRBM Act.
  • REVENUE DEFICIT - The committee had specified a revenue deficit glide path, reaching 0.8% by 2022-23.
  • But, no target has been set by the government for revenue deficit in the present budget.
  • The target of revenue account balance is significant to a country.
  • It is favourable if a country borrows as long as the entire borrowing is spent on capital spending.
  • However, in the Indian context, the revenue deficit with some adjustments reflects government dis-savings.
  • Unless government dis-savings are eliminated, it will be difficult to reverse the trend of a falling savings rate.
  • FISCAL COUNCIL - The Committee recommended the setting up of a fiscal council.
  • This is to independently examine the economic case and justification for deviating from the specified targets.
  • This is to keep a check on unconstrained fiscal flexibility and to prevent the possibly avoidable fiscal risks.
  • The Central government however did not accept this recommendation as well.

What are the concerns?

  • FISCAL DISCIPLINE - A slippage margin of 50 basis points implies a delay in reaching the fiscal deficit target by two and a half years.
  • The government has been missing the fiscal responsibility targets year after year and changing the statutory framework repeatedly.
  • This questions the credibility of the government’s commitment to fiscal discipline.
  • EXTRA-BUDGETARY RESOURCES - In the recent budget, government's total outlay for 3 focus areas is 11.6% of GDP.
  • The focus areas are agriculture and rural livelihoods, infrastructure and education, and health and social sectors.
  • Notably, budgetary resources constitute only 16.4% of the total outlay.
  • The remaining 83.6% is to be raised as an extra-budgetary resource.
  • This will be through the public sector enterprises concerned, special purpose vehicles and other similar institutions.
  • However, a substantial part of this may only be based on borrowing.
  • This is because the relevant bodies may have only limited surpluses.
  • This will be an added borrowing dependence for extra-budgetary resources along with States' borrowing requirements.
  • Given the already falling savings rate, increased borrowing can put considerable pressure on interest rates.

What is the way forward?

  • The fiscal deficit rule in India has been honoured more in breach than in observance.
  • Another year of fiscal slippage can be fatal for the economy.
  • The fiscal deficit target needs continued vigilance to ensure sustainability for larger fiscal benefits.

 

Source: The Hindu

Login or Register to Post Comments
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to review.

ARCHIVES

MONTH/YEARWISE ARCHIVES

Free UPSC Interview Guidance Programme