0.1634
900 319 0030
x

Reforming Agriculture

iasparliament Logo
July 29, 2019

What is the issue?

  • The first meeting of the Chief Ministers’ Committee on transforming agriculture took place recently.
  • In this meeting, it was proposed to link the allocation of Central funds to farm sector reforms in states.

Why do farming reforms have low progress?

  • Several farm sector reforms initiated by the Centre have failed to make much progress.
  • This is because of the states’ apathy, the denial of funding which may prove counterproductive and undermines the spirit of federalism.
  • Squeezing funds would be unfair to do in the above case. But if it is attributable to administrative lethargy and inefficiency or politically motivated one-upmanship, harsher fiscal steps may be justified.

Why the tie-up could be done?

  • Leveraging Central finances for pushing states to hasten reforms is not new.
  • In 2017, the NITI Aayog had advised the agriculture ministry in 2017 to tie up a part of the grant under the Rashtriya Krishi Vikas Yojana (an umbrella farm development scheme) with the implementation of farm sector reforms.
  • However, this proposition was not pursued due to the fear of backlash from state governments.
  • But if some chief ministers are themselves veering round to this view, it may be worthwhile to try it out, even if on a selective basic.

What change could be done?

  • A beginning can be made to push reforms in fields such as agricultural marketing, land leasing, contract farming, crop insurance, and agricultural credit.
  • A way to avoid the states’ indifference towards the Centre’s farmer-oriented agenda could be to shift agriculture from the State list to the Concurrent List of the Constitution’s Seventh Schedule.

Who suggested such a change?

  • Such a statutory translocation of agriculture was suggested by the M S Swaminathan-led National Commission on Farmers in its final report in 2006.
  • The Dalwai committee’s report, 2018 on the issues related to doubling farmers’ income by 2022, also favored putting agricultural marketing on the Concurrent List.
  • However, the amendment to the Constitution for this purpose would require the support of 2/3rd members of both houses of Parliament and an endorsement by a requisite number of state legislatures.  

What is the way forward?

  • To carry forward some vital and need-based reforms in agriculture to restore profitability and mitigate farmers’ lingering financial woes.
  • Exit avenues also need to be created to let farmers quit farming if they intend to do so to improve their livelihood prospects.
  • The Chief Ministers’ panel could come out with practically feasible plans to rejuvenate the country’s farm sector.

 

Source: Business Standard

Login or Register to Post Comments
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to review.

ARCHIVES

MONTH/YEARWISE ARCHIVES

Free UPSC Interview Guidance Programme