0.1528
900 319 0030
x

Special Courts For Trying Politicians - II

iasparliament Logo
November 12, 2017

Click here for Part I

What is the need?

  • Criminalisation of politics is an issue that worries the country's administration for long.
  • Apart from the political parties, it is also a concern for independent institutions such as the Supreme Court and the Election Commission.
  • The political class manages to escape the serious criminal cases because of a delayed and repeatedly postponed trial.
  • Resultantly, many influential politicians facing criminal proceedings continue to engage in contesting elections or holding public office.
  • Certainly, the criminal tendencies of these politicians get carried on to bureaucracy and the police and more importantly into law making.
  • It consequently affects every aspect of public governance from tenders and contracts, safety of buildings and roads to postings and transfers, education and healthcare.

What are the challenges and possible solutions?

  • Shortage of judges - Bringing in place a number of special courts would create the demand for judges.
  • Shortage of judges can be overcome by reappointment of retired High Court Judges as ad hoc judges, as provided under Article 224A.
  • Prosecutors - Appointing prosecutors who are not attached to any political party is another challenge in the working of the special courts.
  • A directorate of prosecution headed by a retired senior judge could be created.
  • This directorate can choose prosecutors who in turn could be inspected by the Chief Justice of the High Court.
  • Delay - Another threat is that the main trial could be obstructed by interim orders.
  • Political leaders finding legal counsel and filing multifarious interim applications could delay the process, defeating the whole purpose.
  • This could be addressed and avoided if there is a provision in place for the Chief Justices to supervise and monitor the trial process.
  • Equality - There is an argument that creating special courts would breach the law of equality.
  • This is not wholly justifiable because, Art 14 permits classification based on criteria and nexus.
  • Clearly, MPs and MLAs form a distinct class and their early trial is a democratic must.
  • They thus deserve to be given priority treatment similar to their special privileges in many other instances and aspects.
  • Besides all these, the concern with ensuring availability of funds, especially from the States has to be addressed by a central scheme.

 

Source: The Hindu

Login or Register to Post Comments
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to review.

ARCHIVES

MONTH/YEARWISE ARCHIVES

Free UPSC Interview Guidance Programme