0.1442
900 319 0030
x

Triple Talaq Ordinance

iasparliament Logo
September 22, 2018

Why in news?

The central government recently passed an Ordinance making instant triple talaq a criminal offence.

What are the purposes of a criminal law?

  • Civil law deals with private wrongs or personal rights wherein compensation is considered sufficient.
  • But the criminal law is concerned with situations in which not just an individual is injured, but also the well-being of society.
  • Mere compensation is considered inadequate in that scenario and punishment is inflicted.
  • The state prosecutes the accused on behalf of society.
  • Criminal sanction is the most coercive method available to the state to regulate the behaviour of an individual.
  • The purpose of criminal law is to forbid and prevent conduct that threatens substantial harm to individual or public interests.

 Why it is not desirable for triple talaq?

  • A punishment should have only the degree of severity which is sufficient to deter others.
  • The Supreme Court has already set aside instant triple talaq in Shayara Bano case (2017).
  • Under this, a Muslim man can no longer use it to cause ‘harm’ to his wife.
  • It also no longer threatens the security and well-being of society as a whole.
  • Criminalising triple talaq equates it with other severe cases like rioting, promoting enmity between people etc., that attract 3 years in jail and/or fine, as this case.
  • These crimes are more serious than the act of an individual who, instead of taking 3 months to divorce his wife (which is permissible), pronounced talaq thrice instantly.
  • Thus, imprisonment of 3 years for triple talaq is excessive, arbitrary, irrational and thus violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.
  • Also the debate on dealing a civil matter under criminal prosecution still remains.

What should be done?

  • In criminalising any act, the state must demonstrate “compelling state interest”.
  • Triple talaq can no longer break the marital tie, following shayara bano judgement, and hence there is no evil in the act that ordinance endeavours to prevent.
  • Hence, the ordinance itself may be struck down as unconstitutional on the grounds of arbitrary and excessive punishment.

 

Source: Indian Express

Login or Register to Post Comments
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to review.

ARCHIVES

MONTH/YEARWISE ARCHIVES

Free UPSC Interview Guidance Programme