0.1889
900 319 0030
x

UNSC Meeting on J&K Situation

iasparliament Logo
August 23, 2019

Why in news?

The United Nations Security Council (UNSC) held a “closed consultation” meeting on the situation in Kashmir, following India scrapping Art 370.

What was the meeting?

  • The 15 members of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) engaged in closed-door informal consultations on the situation in J&K.
  • This was in a response to a letter written by Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi to the President of the UNSC.
  • It was backed by a request by China.
  • Informal consultations are held in the UNSC all the time.
  • There is no official record of the proceedings nor does the informal exchange result in any outcome document.
  • In this case, the only consensus that had the backing of the majority of members was that India and Pakistan should resolve matters bilaterally.

What were the countries’ stances?

  • UK - China’s attempts to get the president of the UNSC to issue an informal statement to the media, was curiously backed by the UK.
  • This was perhaps in the hope of having some gains from the large domestic constituencies of Pakistanis.
  • The UK might also have hoped to get some favour with China to further its mercantilist interests in the face of an imminent Brexit meltdown.
  • Pakistan - Pakistan’s Permanent Representative Maleeha Lodhi made a statement to the media making allegations against India.
  • It was claimed that the voice of the people of Kashmir was being heard in the UNSC.
  • China - China’s Permanent Representative Zhang Jun claimed that members of the UNSC had expressed their serious concern concerning the situation in J&K.
  • He added that they were also concerned about the human rights situation there.

What is India’s stance?

  • The move to revoke Article 370 is expected to bring development and prosperity to the J&K region.
  • It is aimed at providing good governance, promoting social justice and ensuring economic development in J&K.
  • The decisions are claimed to be internal to India.
  • It has also been clarified that the constitutional change in India had no bearing on the boundary issue or the Line of Actual Control with China.

What is China’s larger objective?

  • As known, China treats Pakistan as a quasi-colony and backs it on all matters.
  • However, its initiative to trigger informal consultations in the UNSC may have a broader rationale.
  • China is facing global censure for its -
    1. uncontrolled human rights violations in Xinjiang province
    2. mass incarceration of Uighurs in so-called re-education camps
    3. razing of mosques and other historical places that give the Uighurs their distinct identity
  • The protests in Hong Kong are a reaction to the progressive erosion of the special status accorded to Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
  • So, apart from the Pakistan cause, China is trying to deflect scrutiny of its own actions in Xinjiang and Hong Kong.

Is UNSC involvement new?

  • It is patently wrong to claim that the scrapping of Article 370 has resulted in the “internationalisation of Jammu & Kashmir”.
  • It is also wrong to argue that the informal discussion by UNSC members is the first of its kind in six decades.
  • Agenda - Many sections of the Indian media have erroneously claimed that the last time the UNSC discussed the issue of J&K was in 1965.
  • It is to be noted that the UNSC does not have any agenda item explicitly termed “Jammu and Kashmir”.
  • The only agenda item on its mandate is “The India Pakistan Question”.
  • UNSC resolutions - UNSC Resolutions 209, 210, 211, 214 and 215 of September 1965 focussed on a ceasefire during the India-Pak war.
  • They demanded that the two sides cooperate with UNMOGIP (United Nations Military Observer Group in India and Pakistan).
  • The last formal resolution under the agenda item titled “The India Pakistan Question” was UNSC Resolution 307 held in 1971.
  • This mentioned India’s unilateral declaration of a ceasefire in the western theatre during that war, and Pakistan’s acceptance of it.
  • It also demanded a durable cessation of all hostilities.

How did this evolve?

  • It was under PM Jawaharlal Nehru that India first brought the matter before the UNSC using Article 35 of the UN Charter.
  • A letter (of January 1, 1948) was addressed to the UNSC president from the Representative of India P P Pillai.
  • The agenda item was titled “The Situation in Jammu & Kashmir” until the 230th meeting of the UNSC (held on 20 January 1948).
  • Pakistan too had written a letter dated January 15, 1948, addressed by Pakistan foreign minister, Zafarullah Khan, to the UN secretary general.
  • As a result, the agenda item was re-designated as “The India-Pakistan Question” in the 231st meeting of the UNSC on January 22, 1948.
  • This diluted the question of “aggression” that India had taken up.

How does the future look?

  • With the exception of Pakistan and a few of its supporters, the global community endorses the bilateral framework for resolution of differences between India and Pakistan.
  • The global community will no doubt take positive note of the steps being taken by India to restore normalcy in J&K.
  • E.g. restoration of landlines, phased lifting of restrictions and the re-opening of government offices and schools

 

Source: The Indian Express

Login or Register to Post Comments
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to review.

ARCHIVES

MONTH/YEARWISE ARCHIVES

Free UPSC Interview Guidance Programme