0.1493
900 319 0030
x

US and Iran nuclear deal - Implications

iasparliament Logo
May 10, 2018

What is the issue?

  • The United States has pulled out of the Iran nuclear deal.
  • It is imperative at this juncture to look at the possible global implications and for India in particular.

What is the deal about?

  • It is officially called the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).
  • It was signed between Iran and the P5, plus Germany and the EU in 2015.
  • P5 is the 5 permanent members of the UNSC (US, China, France, Russia, and UK).
  • The deal aimed at curbing Iran's nuclear programme.
  • Under the deal:
  1. most of Iran’s enriched uranium was shipped out of the country
  2. a heavy water facility was rendered inoperable
  3. operational nuclear facilities were brought under international inspection
  • In return, the deal involved lifting of international sanctions on Iran.

What are US's present concerns?

  • Trump administration says the deal did not target Iran’s ballistic missile programme.
  • It does not focus on Iran's nuclear activities beyond 2025.
  • It also leaves Iran's role in conflicts in Yemen and Syria.
  • It is said that the 'one-sided deal' did not bring calm and peace to the region.

What are the strategic reasons behind?

  • Iran has been compliant with the provisions of the deal.
  • The deal is largely a successful one.
  • So the actual concern for US is Iran’s re-accommodation in the global economic mainstream.
  • This is as well the concern for US's closest allies in West Asia, Israel and Saudi Arabia.
  • Iran’s rising economic profile would embolden it to increase its regional presence.
  • This would pose a strategic threat to the interests of the U.S.-Saudi-Israel axis.

What are the global implications of the decision?

  • The US has created a crisis in an already unstable region.
  • It doesn’t necessarily trigger an immediate collapse of the agreement.
  • The UK, Germany, China, France and Russia still remain committed to the agreement.
  • But it is to be seen if Europe and other powers will stick together or change under US pressure.
  • If they deviate from their positions, West Asia will be a lot more dangerous.
  • Iran is cautious, saying it would engage diplomatically with the remaining signatories.
  • Notably, the challenges will emerge not only for Europe, once US sanctions are in place.
  • Other nations with strong trade ties with Iran, including India, would also face the impact.

What is India's stance?

  • India has been a proactive votary of the international rules-based order.
  • It has been extremely supportive of the Iran nuclear deal.
  • India recognises Iran’s right to peaceful uses of nuclear energy.
  • On the other hand, it also highlights the international community’s interest.
  • It has thus maintained that the Iranian nuclear issue should be resolved peacefully.

What are the implications for India?

  • Energy - Until 2010-11, Iran was India’s second-largest oil supplier after Saudi Arabia.
  • But it slipped in subsequent years as international sanctions hit Iran.
  • It is now India’s third-largest supplier after Iraq and Saudi Arabia.
  • But following the 2015 deal, the supplies rose considerably.
  • A disruption to this trend may affect India's energy trade.
  • India and Iran have strategic interests in keeping the relationship sustainable.
  • But it should be insulated from the impact of sanctions.
  • Chabahar port - Chabahar port is both a financial and a strategic investment for India.
  • The engagement between India and Iran on Chabahar has gathered momentum.
  • The work is expected to be completed soon.
  • Possible American sanctions could hit infrastructure development in Chabahar.
  • This could affect the pace of development and cause a delay.
  • However, India may still have options if other signatories stick with the JCPOA.
  • West Asia - Trump’s move would mean US engaging with Iran's regional rivals Saudi Arabia and Israel.
  • This could destabilise the region where over 8 million Indian migrants live and work.
  • Military tensions in West Asia have forced India to evacuate its nationals in the past.
  • However, India's capacity to do so is limited.
  • India-US relationship - In Trump's administration, the US has been hard on Pakistan.
  • But has asked India to be more proactive in the Indo-Pacific, with an eye on China.
  • However, India has been wary of committing too much on the Indo-Pacific strategy.
  • The India-US-Japan-Australia ‘Quad’ is also in the nascent stage.
  • Moreover, uncertainties exist over the relationship with Russia.
  • Amidst these, the Iran situation will test the durability of the “strategic partnership” between India and US.
  • NSG - India is aspiring to join the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG).
  • Given this, it has to make a clearer articulation of commitment to JCPOA.
  • This will help with the Europeans, especially the French, who are backing India’s NSG membership bid.

What lies ahead for India?

  • Chabahar - India’s goal of helping Afghanistan’s reconstruction may be affected if Chabahar is slowed down.
  • Notably, India is engaged in Afghanistan at the request of the Trump administration through $ 1 billion assistance.
  • India may likely argue with its interlocutors in Washington.
  • It could stress that access to Afghanistan is a shared objective of both countries.
  • India-Iran - The government should look at options like the rupee-rial trading mechanism.
  • Opening of Iranian banks in India and Indian banks in Iran could be considered.
  • This would facilitate movement of money and income between the two countries.
  • It is a moment for India and Iran to plan for similar crises in future.

 

Source: Indian Express, The Hindu

Login or Register to Post Comments
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to review.

ARCHIVES

MONTH/YEARWISE ARCHIVES

Free UPSC Interview Guidance Programme