0.1566
900 319 0030
x

Verdict in the 2G Spectrum Case

iasparliament Logo
December 21, 2017

Why in news?

A CBI court recently acquitted all the accused in the 2G spectrum allocation scam case.

How did it all begin?

  • In September 2007, the Department of Telecom (DoT) issued just a week’s time for companies to apply for mobile phone licences.
  • As spectrums were priced artificially low, a mad scramble followed and 575 applications were received, most of which were from little known firms.
  • The DoT then issued 122 licences by adopting a controversial ‘first-come first-served policy’, which privileged those who applied at the earliest.
  • A CAG report in 2008 on 2G spectrum allocations, estimated a loss of R1.76 lakh crore to the exchequer.
  • Consequently, in 2010, Mr. Raja resigned as telecom minister and he was later arrested in early 2011.
  • Notably, the Delhi High Court set up a special court to fast-track the case.

How did the case proceed?

  • CBI filed its chargesheet and subsequently DMK MP ‘Ms. Kanimozhi’ and the MD of “Kalaignar TV” ‘Mr. Sharad Kumar’ were also arrested in late 2011.
  • CBI also filed an FIR against another DMK leader and former telecom minister Dayanidhi Maran and his brother kalanithi Maran.
  • Overall, the trial began against 17 people, that included the  telecom executives of Unitech, Swan Telecom and Reliance Anil Dhirubhai Ambani Group.
  • In early 2012, Supreme Court cancelled all the 122 telecom licences allocated to nine companies in 2007, by holding ‘first-come, first-served’ policy at fault.
  • Income-Tax department, in 2013, submitted to the SC, the recordings of 5,800 tapped controversial phone conversations between corporate lobbyist Niira Radia and politicians.
  • Enforcement Directorate (ED), in its 2014 chargesheet, accused Mr. Raja, and Ms. Kanimozhi of money laundering.
  • In 2015, CBI records in court that the Mr. Raja “misled” the then PM Manmohan Singh on policy matters pertaining to 2G spectrum allocation.
  • Finally, the special court concluded its hearing in April 2017, and it recently pronounced its final order, which aquitted all the people.
  • It remains to be seen if the case is proceeded ahead with appeals against the current order in higher courts (HC and SC).

What are the policy spin-offs from the case?

  • SC’s order that cancelled all the 122 2G licences issued in 2008 was perceieved as a judicial over-reach into the policy domain.
  • Hence, it moved a presidential reference with eight questions, that included the rationale of “auction being the only mode for allocation of resources”.
  • On hearing the presidential reference, by five-judge constitution bench, the SC concluded uphoplding the primacy of the government in the policy domain.
  • It also explicitly stated that auctions is not a must for all resource allocations and that maximisation of revenue cannot be the sole criterion in all situations.

 

Source: Hindustan Times

Login or Register to Post Comments
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to review.

ARCHIVES

MONTH/YEARWISE ARCHIVES

Free UPSC Interview Guidance Programme