766 776 6266

Need for a GST Version 2.0

iasparliament Logo
August 05, 2021

What is the issue?

  • After four years, the promises of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) remain substantially unrealised.
  • A GST version 2.0 may have to be designed soon given the flaws in the existing structure.

What is the overall outcome?

  • The goal of avoidance of cascading of various taxes is not met.
  • The tax system continues to be a not very transparent multi-rate system.
  • There are also associated difficulties in computing and assessing tax liability, tax burden and tax incidence.
  • States have less headroom in handling GST collection shortfall after surrendering their fiscal autonomy.
  • The tax base of GST does not appear to be expanding as the recent uptick has reversed in July 2021.
  • Revenue collection of the GST is dependent on the nominal growth rate of Gross Value Added (GVA) in the economy.
  • The Tax to Gross value addition is only about 5% to 6.5% though GVA growth was much higher.
  • This indicates that a very large segment is covered by exemption, composition schemes, evasion and lower tax rate.

What are the key challenges in the current GST structure?

  • Disputes - The fundamental weakness of the GST is its political architecture as it is asymmetrically loaded in favour of the Centre.
  • No particular body is tasked to adjudicate disputes, between States and between the Centre and the States, that are inevitable in a tax arrangement as the GST.
  • This is despite the fact that the original Constitution (115th Amendment) Bill 2011 (GST Bill) had a provision for such an institution.
  • Compensation scheme - GST Compensation Cess was introduced to compensate the losses of states for the first 5 years under the GST regime.
  • Severe fiscal strain is expected when this 14% compensation comes to an endin 2022.
  • The contraction of GST revenue across the country means that the compensation amount will be higher.
  • So, the demand for a continuance of compensation scheme is inevitable.

What are the other issues to be resolved?

  • Design flaws-Nearly 45% to 50% of commodity value is outside the purview of the GST, such as petrol and petroleum products.
  • In addition, States which export or have inter-State transfers or mineral and fossil fuel extractions are not getting revenue as the origin States.
  • They require a compensation mechanismto get this.
  • Most trading and retail establishments, (however small) are out of the fold of the GST.
  • At the retail level, irrespective of whether Input Tax Credit (ITC) is required or not, the burden can be passed on to the consumer.
  • As a result, the loss could be as high as one third.
  • Exemptions - Exemptions from registration and taxation of the GST have further eroded the GST tax base compared to the tax base of the pre-existing VAT.
  • Exemptions are purely distortionary and directly increase evasion or misclassification, and reduce tax realisation.
  • Exclusion- Petroleum products remaining outside the purview of GST has helped the Centre to increase cesses and decrease central excise.
  • This would have otherwise been shareable with the States.
  • In April 2017, cess and surcharge formed 56% and 35% of the excise duty on petrol and diesel, respectively.
  • Now, their share has increased to 91% and 85%, respectively.
  • But the shareable central excise (with the states) has reduced by ₹6.5 a litre together (both petrol and diesel).
  • GSTR - Compliance with GST return (GSTR-1) filing stipulation and the resultant tax information is not up to date.
  • Also, fraudulent claims of Input Tax Credit (ITC) because of a lack of timely reconciliation are quite high though it has come down by two thirds.
  • Tax evasionis at least 5% in minor States and plus 3% in the major States.

What do these call for?

  • Instead of the four rates/slabs, a single uniform tax rate for all commodities and services at all stages, inputs and outputs alike, would work better.
  • Over all, policy gaps along with compliance gaps need to be addressed.
  • Without proper tax information, infrastructure and base, the States would go in for selective tax enforcement.
  • In the long run, voluntary compliance will suffer and equity in taxation will be violated.
  • Given all these problems, a version 2.0 of GST may have to be designed sooner rather than later.


Source: The Hindu

Login or Register to Post Comments
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to review.



Upsc Mains 2022